The Context[]
Near the end of the 2013 puzzle, after solvers retrived the messeages from posters around the world, they combined them using Shamir's Secret Sharing Scheme to decrypt the messeage which was:
p7amjopgric7dfdi.onion
This was the fifth onion on the 2013 puzzle.
Here is how test looked: http://imgur.com/a/YFA1a
Upon entering their emails into the website, the solvers were given a set of test questions, and requested not to publish them. There were 19 questions in total, with three different types.
It has been noted that the abstractness of these questions is very similar to the questions that Google supposedly asks its interviewees for serious roles at the company. They can supposedly be used to determine a person's personality and type.
Each question in the test was timed to prevent one from externally researching questions, and the questions chosen were in a random order from the above pool.
For the full context visit the puzzle page.
The First Type[]
The first type of question gave a statement and then a multitude of answers, which were:
- True
- False
- Indeterminate
- Meaningless
- Self-Referential
- Game Rule
- Strange Loop
- None of the above
These statements were the following:
There is no truth What you are is more important than what you do You cannot step into the same river twice Observation changes the thing being observed This sentence is false I am the voice* inside my head (You undoubtedly just thought "I don't have a voice inside my head." That is the voice the question is referring to) Disregarding color blindness, any arbitrary color looks the same to all people If A is not true, then it must be: 1 = 0.9 recurring People who only study material after a test do better than those who do not study at all Grass is only green due to a relationship between the grass, the light and your mind All things are true We get hundreds of millions of sensations coming into our minds at any moment. Our brain cannot process them all so it categorises these signals according to our belief systems. This is why we find evidence to support our beliefs and rarely notice evidence to the contrary.
Origin[]
The set of answers was originally devised by counterculture figure Robert Anton Wilson (better known as the co-author of the Illuminatus! trilogy of novels and a founder of pseudo-religion Discordianism), and described in his 1986 book The New Inquisition (1987, Falcon Press). Wilson initially challenges the reader to evaluate propositions like "God has spoken to me" as either true or false, to demonstrate the limits of Aristotelian thought[1]. To account for the complexity of human thought and language, he gradually expands the set of answers to include:
- self-referential: a personal truth, e.g. "Marilyn Monroe was the most beautiful woman of her time"[2]
- indeterminate: neither true nor false, e.g. "There is a tenth planet in our solar system, beyond Pluto" (when the book was written, this couldn't be verified nor refuted)[3][4]
- meaningless: grammatically correct but impossible to evaluate as a logical proposition, e.g. "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously"[3]
- game rule: an axiom, true by definition in a certain system, e.g. "The Pope is infallible in matters of faith and morals"[5]
- strange loop: a paradox, e.g. "The following sentence is true. The preceeding sentence is false". Wilson borrows the term from Douglas Hofstadter, author of Gödel, Escher, Bach[6] (used by Cicada the next year in a book code).
Cicada's use of Wilson's logical system was first noted by Wilson fan Tom Jackson, in early January 2014, on his blog; in turn, Jackson credits another fan, Liam Harnett, with the discovery. On January 31st, 2014, an anonymous user editing Wikipedia through an open proxy added Robert Anton Wilson to the philosophical sources of inspiration for Cicada 3301 (the article has since been rewritten, removing any reference to Wilson).
The Second Type[]
The second type of question included an input box with a question. These questions were:
What does the word 'it' refer to in this sentence: It is dark outside? The mathematical operation known as addition is modeled after what? Explain, in your own words, what mathematical operation is relied upon for the security of Shamir's Secret Sharing Scheme? Name similarities between the concept and reality of the 'News Feed' on Facebook? In the programming language of your choice, write a function that returns the value 3301.
The Third Type[]
The final type of question only appeared once, and it had different radio buttons to the first type. This question was:
Two people are standing by a lake. One says, "That's a lovely reflection in the water." The other says "I see no reflection, but it's a fascinating assortment of fish, plants and rocks within the water." Which one is lying?
The answers to this question were:
- The one who sees the reflection
- The one who sees the fish
- Neither
- Both
The relevance of the questions to our current progress[]
It is very apparent that a lot of question have a lot of themes in common with the Liber Primus, moreover, some questions are directly appearing in the LP.
For example:
I am the voice* inside my head (You undoubtedly just thought "I don't have a voice inside my head." That is the voice the question is referring to)
Is the opposite point of view in the conversation between the master and the student in the Koan (107.jpg)
and
There is no truth
Is connected to the theme of subjective thruth spread throughout the LP in various ways, for example 229.jpg
Discussion About The Questions[]
In this section we'll discuss about possible answers to the questions and compile answers from the Discord.
this section is divided into questions for maximum coherence of reading.
- If you want to sumbit your question write them in the page's comments or send them in the cicada solvers Discord server
Important note: In order to keep the answers as authentic with regard to "each question in the test was timed to prevent one from externally researching questions", answers which answerd in time limit (with no prior digesting.) will be more close to the source and will be marked in RED.
Question #1 - There is no truth[]

~anon
By necessity, false. It is at least necessary that the statement “This statement is true,” is in fact true. Truth must exist by necessity in this way. Particular truths are not necessary true. But if anything exists at all, even if everything is an illusion, it is necessary to say that at least “Something truly exists.” or else, “There truly are illusions of real things.” If nothing is at it seems to be, and we know nothing as it really is, we must at least say although it is unknowable to us, “There are true things.” Something must be true. This is necessary. But if we look at it, it is much more reasonable and requires far less assumptions to say what we perceive to be is indeed more likely true than not. It is more reasonable to presume truths that require the least number of assumption. This is ‘Ockham’s Razor’. That the simpler answer, that requires the least number of assumptions for it to be true, is indeed more likely true. It is much harder to do the mental gynamistic necessity and burdensome assumptions to come to the tenet that “This statement is the only true idea.” than to merely rest on the assumption that the senses are more or less reliable. It is more reasonable to presume the simpler tenet: There is truth. Final answer - False
Question #2 - What you are is more important than what you do[]

~anon
What you do contributes to what you are. However, what you are is much greater than what you do. Final answer - Game Rule
Question #3 - You cannot step into the same river twice[]

~anon
Depends on your definition of "river". This is discussed fantastically here: (https://aeon.co/ideas/can-you-step-in-the-same-river-twice-wittgenstein-v-heraclitus). Final answer - Indeterminate
Question #4 - Observation changes the thing being observed[]

~anon
Sometimes, An example of when observation causes change is the Heisenbug. An example of when observation doesn't cause change would be if I observed the rain falling from inside my house, that has no impact the rain falling, Final answer - Indeterminate
Question #5 - This sentence is false[]

~anon
Liar paradox. Final answer - Strange Loop
Question #6 - I am the voice* inside my head[]

~anon
Mostly the voices in your head are produced by psychological mechanisms. Identifying with those voices is one of the basic mistakes that humans make which prevent them from recognizing true self. Final answer - False
Question #7 - any arbitrary color looks the same to all people[]

~anon
Humans percieve color differently. One cool example of why I see color differently to my friend is because he is a tetrachromat. Final answer - False
Question #8 - If A is not true, then it must be:[]

~anom
Contraposition. Final answer - None of the Above
Question #9 - 1 = 0.9 recurring[]

~anon
Assuming question is expressed in regular number base/system form. Final answer - True
Question #10 - People who only study material after a test do better than those who do not study at all[]

~anon
Depends on definition of "do better". Final answer - Indeterminate
Question 11 - Grass is only green due to a relationship between the grass, the light and your mind[]

~anon
Yep, this is how color perception works - green is not "in" grass. The surface of the grass is reflecting the wavelengths we see as green and absorbing all the rest. Final answer - True
Question 12 - All things are true[]

~anon
All things have elements of truth, but not all things are true. Final answer - False
Question 13 - We get hundreds of millions of sensations[]

~anon
brain can't process them all so it categorizes these signals according to our belief systems. This is why we find evidence to support our beliefs and rarely notice evidence to the contrary.
Question 14 - What does the word 'it' refer to in this sentence: It is dark outside?[]

~anon
"It" is a dummy pronoun. In this sentence, it is a placeholder for the word "dark." The true meaning of the sentence is "Dark(ness) is (exists) outside." But English doesn't look kindly on Latinate constructions, so the speaker conjures an imaginary "it" (a pronoun, or stand-in for a noun) and says "it" is dark, without intending to mean that there is an actual entity that is dark.
Question 15 - The mathematical operation known as addition is modeled after what?[]

~anon
Counting
Question 16 - Explain Shamir Secret Sharing Scheme?[]

~anon
You can fit a unique polynomial of degree n − 1 to any set of n points that lie on the polynomial
Question #17 - Name similarities between the concept and reality of the 'News Feed' on Facebook?[]

~anon
It is dependent on the observer. It can be tweaked to induce emotions such as happiness and sadness. It can expose us to new and challenging ideas. It can insulate people into ideological bubbles.
Question #18 - Write a function that returns a function that returns the value 3301[]

~anon
Question #19 - Two people are standing by a lake[]

~anon
A seemingly meaningless question with not enough evidence to support or negate any answer. Personally, I think neither are lying as they are both seeing the lake from different positions and there is no reason for either of their positions to be incorrect. Final answer - Neither
- ↑ Robert Anton Wilson. The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Falcon Press, 1987, p. 7
- ↑ Robert Anton Wilson. The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Falcon Press, 1987, p. 49
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Robert Anton Wilson. The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Falcon Press, 1987, p. 58
- ↑ The tenth planet was discovered in 2005, and named after Eris... goddess of discord. "Discordian pope" Wilson was still alive (he would die in 2007) but he doesn't seem to have commented on the coincidence. In 2006 both Eris and Pluto would be demoted to dwarf planets (i.e. a "game rule" change), lowering the number of planets in the solar system to eight. Ironically, as of 2021, it's the ninth planet that's yet to be discovered.
- ↑ Robert Anton Wilson. The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Falcon Press, 1987, p. 59
- ↑ Robert Anton Wilson. The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Falcon Press, 1987, pp. 59-60